Alice jumps to the White Rabbit’s call to the stand.
She forgets that she has grown larger and knocks over the jury stand, then scrambles to put every one of the jurors back. Alice claims to understand “nothing whatever” about the tarts, that the King deems “very important.” The King is corrected by the White Rabbit, suggesting which he in reality means “unimportant.” The King agrees, muttering the text that is“important “unimportant” to himself.
The King interjects with Rule 42, which states, “All persons significantly more than a mile high to go out of the court.” Everyone turns to Alice, who denies she actually is a mile high and accuses the King of fabricating the rule. The King replies that Rule 42 may be the oldest rule in the book, but Alice retorts that it ought to be the first rule if it is the oldest rule in the book. The King becomes quiet for a moment before calling for a verdict. The White Rabbit interrupts and declares that more evidence must be presented first. A paper is presented by him supposedly published by the Knave, though it isn’t printed in the Knave’s handwriting. The Knave refutes the charge, explaining that there surely is no signature regarding the document. The King reasons that the Knave must have meant mischief because he did not sign the note like an man that is honest. The court seems pleased by this reasoning, as well as the Queen concludes that the Knave’s is proved by the paper guilt. Alice demands to read the poem on the paper. The King provides an explanation and calls for a verdict while the poem appears to have no meaning. The Queen demands that the sentence come ahead of the verdict. Alice chaffs as of this proposal and criticizes the Queen, who calls for Alice’s beheading. Alice has grown to her full size and bats away the handmade cards because they fly upon her.
Alice suddenly wakes up and finds herself back on her behalf sister’s lap during the riverbank. She tells her adventures to her sister who bids her go inside for tea. Alice traipses off, while her sister remains because of the riverbank daydreaming. She envisions the characters from Alice’s adventures, but understands that when she opens her eyes the images will dissipate. She imagines that Alice will one grow older but retain her childlike spirit and recount her adventures to other children day.
The chapter title “Alice’s Evidence” refers both to your evidence that Alice gives through the trial, and also the evidence that she discovers that Wonderland is a dream that she can control by getting up. Alice realizes through the trial so it all “doesn’t matter a bit” what the jury records or if the jury essay writer is upside down or right side up. None associated with details or orientations in Wonderland have any bearing on a coherent or outcome that is meaningful. Alice’s growth during the trial mirrors her growing understanding of the undeniable fact that Wonderland is an illusion. She starts to grow when the Mad Hatter bites into his teacup, and she reaches full height during the heated exchange with the Queen when she points out that her antagonists are “nothing but a pack of cards!” Alice exposes Wonderland as an illusion along with her growth to full size is sold with her realization that she’s got a measure of control of the illusion. Once she realizes that Wonderland is a dream, she wakes up and shatters the illusion.
Alice fully grasps the nonsensical nature of Wonderland once the King interprets the Knave’s poem. Alice disputes the King’s tries to attach meaning to your nonsense words of the poem. Her criticisms are ironic, since throughout her travels she has continually attempted to sound right of this various situations and stories she has encountered. Alice finally understands the futility when trying to create meaning out of her adventures of Wonderland since every part of it really is completely incomprehensible. This message is intended not merely for Alice but also for the readers of Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland as well. In the same way the court complies with the King’s harebrained readings associated with the poem, Carroll sends a note to people who would try to assign specific meanings to the events. Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland actively resists interpretation that is definitive which makes up about the diversity of this criticism written about the novella.
The scene that is final Alice’s sister establishes narrative symmetry and changes the tone of Alice’s journey from harrowing quest to childhood fantasy.
The reintroduction associated with scene that is calm the riverbank allows the story to close as it began, transforming Wonderland into an isolated episode of fancy. Alice’s sister ends the novella by changing the tone of Alice’s story, discounting the nightmarish qualities and favoring a dreamy nostalgia for “the simple and loving heart of her childhood.” The interpretation that is sister’s Alice’s experience of trauma and trivializes the journey only a small amount more than a “strange tale” that Alice may eventually recount to her very own children.